|
|
Post by shepherd on Apr 25, 2009 6:48:00 GMT -7
The past couple of days others as well as my self noticed that when IKF has a server up something is odd. Allow me to explain; IKF has a 12 person server up and it will indicate that there are 8 people in the server. When you click on that server only 4 names appear. What has happened to the other 4 player’s name? As I said I am not the only one that has witness this oddity. Before signing out last night I asked Nebula for his input on this phenomenon and he was at a loss to explain how this might happen. Perhaps it's just a glitch or perhaps it's something worse. I can see how this could happen once and maybe twice but repeatedly over several nights makes us all wonder. With the poor track record of IKF activities in BC suggests that something is not right. With Kraagg’s handy work as we all know in manipulating scripts and hard points in BC raise yet another red flag on this missing players names. What are you boys up too?
I want to continue urging all clans and independents to avoid IKF and their hosted servers. These boys seem to go out of their way to create havoc and distrust in all of their affairs. Truly the best way to handle these dime store hoods is just reject them and walk away. NONASSOCIATION will put them in their places. DD left BC because they could not support the weight of all their dirty dealings and not so much as war with any clans. Now IKF has most definitely surpassed DD’s underhanded deeds hands down.
Fire needs oxygen and fuel to burn and grow take away one of the two elements and it dies.
Shepherd
|
|
|
|
Post by lolnoobs on Apr 25, 2009 9:50:22 GMT -7
what ever happened to letting go and letting the past be the past and ignoring htem all? it seems that with your incredible forum of only 5 people including me, you only care what is going on along with taonas. it seems are you as guilty as them when it comes to not letting go. does that not make you a hypocrite?
|
|
|
|
Post by shepherd on Apr 25, 2009 14:39:15 GMT -7
On the contrary. Our remarks are those that follow events and not the facilitator. Due to the fact that IKF seems to go out of their way to make problems in BC keeps them under the spot light and not just by the Freelancers but by others in BC. Although we only have 5 registered members including yourself now doesn’t mean any thing. You only have to register if you wish to make a comment. The forum is set up to give out information and to help out where we can. If you will notice that our Team Speak we have channels set up for SaW, SoJ, FH and so on. Some of these clans do not have TS so we provide a service for these clans. Another point is the number of times a post is view shows that out side of the members that have register clearly indicates that we have many that stop by for information. Unlike some forums that I have read where the members seems to make comments to anything and everything no matter its importance.
So the fact that a clan has a multitude of posts about them isn’t a problem that we can help. For example; you hardly ever hear a breaking story about Austria but Iran you hear every day. Get it? It would give me great pleasure to post positive remarks toward IKF if and when it is deserved. Until they can show that they wish to be a positive influence in the BC community they will continue being watched and scored by the majority.
If we don’t work together to make BC fun, positive and exciting I’m afraid that BC will continue to slowly erode to its end.
I have left the past in the past. Perhaps you could enlighten me of what past you are referring too so that I may make amends to any such transgressions. All information and data here is from when we first set up this website and nothing here prior to its existence. So it isn't clear to me when you say let the past be the past.
Thank you for your input.
Shepherd
|
|
|
|
Post by shepherd on Apr 26, 2009 19:25:13 GMT -7
This oddity isn't happening to just IKF server I see. DD had a server up tonight and it was set for 16 players but only four show up. This must be a Gamespy problem. So I would like to make amend for saying that IKF could have been up to no good.
I will follow up on this with Gamespy tomorrow.
Shepherd
|
|
|
|
Post by lolnoobs on Apr 26, 2009 20:07:39 GMT -7
and yet ur here still posting all of this to keep the fire going.
|
|
|
|
Post by shepherd on Apr 26, 2009 20:39:07 GMT -7
A fire burns due to fuel and oxygen. If IKF are furnishing both of the elements and they are, then they have only themselves to blame for the wild fire they started.
You have not answered my question on what past you are referring to. I can not fix what I can not see what it is your referring to. If these issues are to be resolved then you will have to elaborate by communicating to me what it is that you are referring too. So if I have failed then you and I have failed together in correcting what it is that is concerning you.
I do want to understand your point. I do what to hear your side but 5 or 6 words is insufficient of a response on your behalf to understand your side. If I am wrong here I will be delighted to retract and make amends to any of my remarks at Freelancers.
I await your response.
Shepherd
|
|
|
|
Post by Taonas Deridran on Apr 27, 2009 18:06:51 GMT -7
I welcome you lolnoobs. It is nice to have another opinion here at Freelancers. However, this forum was created for posting facts, not just speculation. While you are saying that Shepherd is keeping the fire burning, you are not leaving evidence that proves that the fire is being fueled. I haven't seen a single IKF in Shepherd's server for a couple of months. Not only that, but I haven't seen a large sum of posts about Shepherd in IKF. As far as I can tell, you are the only one trying to rekindle the fire. All we are doing here is posting information we have noticed about IKF.
Taonas
|
|
|
|
Post by shepherd on May 2, 2009 18:46:30 GMT -7
Well I witnessed this oddity at my own server. I haven't got a hold of Game Spy as of yet but this seems to be something to do with Game Spy.
Again my apologies to IKF on this accusation.
Shepherd
|
|
